Industry: Real Estate
In a decision dated March 10, 2009, Justice Pines granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment upon finding that the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact supporting their claim that they entered into a real estate contract based on defendants’ misrepresentations regarding the zoning limitations where the defendants presented the clear and unambiguous contracts and riders which specifically stated that the plaintiffs did not rely on any representations by the defendants or their agents, and the agreements were subject to covenants and restrictions that were on file with the County Clerk, and the plaintiffs were entering into the agreements based on their own investigation of the subject property.
Click here for full decision.